I went to her website which is http://roseanneworld.com/blog/

It is similiar:

70% of black californians

who voted this cycle voted for prop 8. As they overwhelmingly supported America's first chance to elect a person of color and strike a death blow to racism, they also went out of their way to misuse their votes (no doubt at the behest of their immoral and hateful pastors and clergy) to isolate and punish a small minority of citizens, and to deny them basic civil rights.
They voted to deny over 70,000 californian children coverage of the insurance benefits of their gay parents. They voted to destroy the constitution that Obama will hopefully uphold against their wishes, by making sure that church and state remain separated. They voted to "uphold the sanctity of marriage" by making a mockery of it. They showed themselves every inch as bigoted and ignorant as their white christian right wing counterpartners who voted for mccain-palin and bush-cheney.
When i suggested a couple of years ago that gay organizations should build official bridges with african american organizations, in order to build political consensus and not just represent a purely gay agenda, this very vote is what I was trying to speak to.
The gay community needs to do outreach to the black and latino christian and immigrant communities.

the more things change, the more they stay the same.
REPENT all ye bible blabbers!!!!
babble on babylon

But I don't see word n!gger in it

AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IT IS. AS A CALIFORNIAN WHO VOTED YES ON 8, THE MEDIA IS PISSING ME OFF ACTING LIKE BLACKS VOTED THE WHOLE BILL DOWN. FIRST OF ALL IT WASN'T BLACKS WHO CREATED THIS PROPOSITION, SECONDLY, IT WAS 70% OF BLACK VOTERS, NOT 70% OF THE VOTES WERE BLACK, THIRDLY, THEY ARE TRYING ANYTHING IN THEIR POWER TO RAIN ON OUR PARADE. WHAT ABOUT ALL THE HISPANICS THAT VOTED FOR THIS, WHAT ABOUT ALL THE WHITES THAT VOTED, THEY EACH HAD MAJORITY OF THEIR VOTERS VOTE YES AS WELL. THEY NEED TO QUIT MAKING BLACKS SEEM LIKE THE BAD GUYS IN ALL THIS.

They voted to deny over 70,000 californian children coverage of the insurance benefits of their gay parents

AND I THINK ROSEANNE IS WRONG ABOUT THE BILL, IT WAS NOT TO BAN THE COVERAGE, THEY ALREADY RECEIVE THAT, IT WAS JUST TO DEFINE THE DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.  CALIFORNIA LAW STATES WE CANNOT DISCRIMINAT AGAINST RELIGION, COLOR, SEX GENDER, OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION. AND THAT'S WHAT COVERS DOMESTIC PARTNERS AND ADPTIVE CHILDREN FOR MEDICAL BENEIFTS. SO THEY ARE RECEIVING ALL THE BENEFITS, EXCEPT BEING CALLED A MARRIED COUPLE. AND TO SAY THAT WE MISSUED OUR RIGHTS IS BULLSH*T. WE EXERCISED THE RIGHT TO OUR OPINION AND SHE JUST DOESN'T AGREE WITH US. NOW SINCE IN MY OPINION THIS IS MORE ABOUT RELIGION, THEN SHE CAN MOVE TO ANOTHER COUNTRY, BECAUSE AMERICA WAS FOUNDED ON CHRISTIANITY, OUR MONEY SAYS IN GOD WE TRUST, IF SHE DOESN'T LIKE IT, THEN SHE CAN WORK AND SEND HER KIDS TO SCHOOL ON XMAS, AND EASTER AND STOP SPENDING OUR MONEY. SHE IS JEWISH RIGHT? THEN IT SHOULDN'T BE AN ISSUE THEN.

I'M NOT ANGRY, JUST SICK OF HEARING IT SPUN LIKE WE WERE THE ONLY ONES WHO WERE ALLOWED TO VOTE ON THIS MEASURE. WELL 75% OF BLACKS VOTED FOR THIS BILL, I WILL GIVE YOU THAT, BUT WHAT ARE THE NUMBERS AS FAR AS HOW MANY PEOPLE THAT EQUATED TO? LET'S SAY 1,000,000 WERE BLACK BUT MAYBE 3,000,000 WERE WHITE THAT VOTED YES. SO PROPORTIONATLEY A HIGHER PERCENTAGE VOTED YES, BUT MAYBE IT WAS A HIGHER NUMBER OF WHITES THAT VOTED YES. I'M JUST SAYING.