Ages & Stages
Careers & Money
Cities
- Albany, NY
- Atlanta, GA
- Atlantic City, NJ
- Birmingham, AL
- Boston, MA
- Caribbean Forum
- Charlotte, NC
- Chicago, IL
- Cincinnati, OH
- Cleveland, OH
- Columbia, SC
- Columbus, OH
- Dallas, TX
- Denver, CO
- Detroit, MI
- Hartford, CT
- Houston, TX
- Indianapolis, IN
- Jackson, MS
- Jacksonville, FL
- Kansas City, MO
- Las Vegas, NV
- Los Angeles, CA
- Louisville, KY
- Memphis, TN
- Miami & South FL
- Milwaukee, WI
- Nashville, TN
- New Orleans, LA
- New York City, NY
- Newark, NJ
- Norfolk, VA
- Oklahoma City, OK
- Philadelphia, PA
- Phoenix, AZ
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Portland, OR
- Raleigh, NC
- Richmond, VA
- San Antonio, TX
- San Diego, CA
- San Francisco, CA
- Savannah, GA
- Seattle, WA
- St. Louis, MO
- Tampa & Central, FL
- Tulsa, OK
- Twin Cities, MN
- Washington, DC
- Wichita, KS
Education
Entertainment
Family & Ancestry
Gay & Lesbian
General
Health & Fitness
Hobbies & Interests
Love & Relationships
News & Sports
Spirituality
People Search
Entertainment > Entertainment
"BIRTH OF A NATION" ON TCM...WTF???(143)
|
TCM is showing what is possibly the most racist film ever made - the 1915 silent movie "Birth of a Nation" by famed director D.W. Griffith (tonight at 8 EST).
My question is WHY??? Why would they drag this movie out of the gutter and show it in this day and age??? It serves no purpose other than to inflame racial insensitivity and promote the KKK...it is only film that can think of, that I would like to see banned FOREVER!
What's your opinion? (And no, I don't plan to see it - I had to stomach that piece of filth when I was in college, in one of my film studies classes...and that was in the era of "Roots!" I REALLY did not like white people for a LONG time...NONE of 'em!) WTF is TCM's problem??? _____________________________ The Birth of a NationFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search
The Birth of a Nation—one of the most popular films of the silent era—is technically important as a silent film for its innovative techniques. However, the film attempts to provides historical justification for segregation. In the sympathetic depiction of the lynching of a black man by a white mob, the film affirms and promotes the cultural milieu for the rise of the Ku Klux Klan which led mobs of white people wearing white sheets and hoods over their faces in the lynching of African American people. The highly controversial film was directed by D. W. Griffith, based on Thomas Dixon's novels The Clansman and The Leopard's Spots. The film was released in 1915 and has been credited with securing the future of feature length films (any film over an hour in length) as well as solidifying the codes of film language. The film premiered on February 8, 1915 in Los Angeles, California under the title The Clansman, but was retitled at its world premiere in New York...[Message truncated]
Edited by SloeWyne on May 2, 2006 07:36:55 PM
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A few years ago I thought TCM said they would not play that movie again..... Oh well, I have not seen, even though I know of it.....I want to see it....
The reason they are playing it is because All month in May (actually only Tuesdays and Thursdays) TCM will be playing movies with blacks (the negative and the positive). Although all of the black characters are actually just whites in black face, the point is to show how hollywood showed blacks in movies. Edited by moionfire on May 2, 2006 07:36:36 PM
|
|
It's part of their kickoff for "Race & Hollywood." Here's the information from the TCM website:
Introduction to Race & Hollywood
![]() |
| This message has been deleted |
|
There was no Donald Bogle to explain this film when I saw it...we did have to come to our own conclusions, and write a paper about it...don't remember what I said in my paper, but the overwhelming emotion among our class (all Black) was complete and total outrage...
But I do understand the need to put the film into a context that explains how it came to be, and what it meant.
Without knowing about TCM's Blacks in Film series, I was just floored to see it on the schedule... |
|
You have to remember that "Roots" had just been shown (I think that's why our prof decided to screen BoAN THEN...), and I don't know which was worse...my outrage over the attitudes of the time, or the fact that I had to sit through it.
Don't remember it being creepy (this was 30 years ago)...but I'm sure it is. |
|
"What's your opinion?"
Its actually a good film (from a technical standpoint)....so its worth watching/studying ...its the subject matter and angeda of the movie that is contreversial and offensive to many.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WTC Building 7
|
| This message has been deleted |
|
I agree.
I also saw this movie on my own accord a few years ago. I wanted to stare into the face of the murky history of race in this country. Here's a little fact for ya'll: Did you know that Birth of a Nation was the first film that was screened in the White House? (not the premiere of the film, but it was the first film they ever watched in the white house) That's a disturbing (and telling) fact about the administration at that time. |
Requesting Removal of Inappropriate Content
If you feel a post violates our Terms Of Service and would like to request its removal, please submit the following information.
E-mail message to a friend
To:
Mail Sent Successfully
Report Sent Successfully
You must sign in first.
Click here to enter your user name and password.
BV on Facebook
Did you know Black Voices is on Facebook and we update daily with new stories and message board discussions?
Friend Black Voices
Most Recent Posters
-
6 mins
-
8 mins
-
9 mins
-
12 mins
-
22 mins
-
36 mins








